Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Noah Overton <NOAH_OVERTON@*************.OM.HP.COM>
Subject: objectives
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 07:37:42 -0800
Item Subject: cc:Mail Text
sorry if this sounds stupid but kinda new to the game. but what a
great game.

the question I've got is when you take an objective what happens to
the challenges that are still there? i.e. your own challenges that you
do not face.

Noah
Message no. 2
From: Noah Overton <NOAH_OVERTON@*************.OM.HP.COM>
Subject: objectives
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 10:52:32 -0800
sorry if this sounds stupid but kinda new to the game. but what a
great game.

the question I've got is when you take an objective what happens to
the challenges that are still there? i.e. your own challenges that you
do not face.

Noah
Message no. 3
From: robert john harris <rjharris@********.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: objectives
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 12:55:58 -0600
According to the Online Official FAQ from FASA, all the challenges remaining
on an Objective when it is taken are trashed. Hope that helps!

Rob
Message no. 4
From: Skeeter <cmm@********.COM>
Subject: Objectives...
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 22:49:55 -0800
I heard that "sucker run" does not count towards the minimum number of
objectives in your deck (6)... Well, if that is true, then why does the
GenCon sample deck have the following objectives in it...

Cermak Blast (1)
Courier Run (1)
Fort Knocks (1)
Ragnarock (1)
Sucker Run (1)

If that is true, you wouldn't count "sucker run" and have a total of 4
objectives... why is this deck like this? did they change the rules before
the game came out? and even if you did count "sucker run" you would have
only 5! This must be a subliminal message from the government... THEY ARE
DRIVING US ALL SLOWLY INSANE!! THEY ARE INSIDE MY HEAD!!! AHHHHHHHH!!!!! GET
THEM OUT!!


Skeeter...
Message no. 5
From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Objectives...
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 00:15:53 -0800
Skeeter wrote:

> I heard that "sucker run" does not count towards the minimum number of
> objectives in your deck (6)... Well, if that is true, then why does the
> GenCon sample deck have the following objectives in it...

> Cermak Blast (1)
> Courier Run (1)
> Fort Knocks (1)
> Ragnarock (1)
> Sucker Run (1)

> If that is true, you wouldn't count "sucker run" and have a total of 4
> objectives... why is this deck like this?

'Cuz it's a demonstration deck, not a tournament-legal deck. IIRC, the
GenCon decks only had fifty cards, too.


-Matt

------------------------------------
Beware the man who casts two shadows.

GridSec: SRCard / Wolf in Shepherd's Clothing
Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about objectives, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!