Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: ">>>>> Axlrose - ... <<<<<" <axlrose@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 22:48:52 -0500
At 07:42 PM 2/14/98 -0800, you wrote:
>---Gilbert Glaze <yleecoyote@*********.NET> wrote:

>> I already have a set, but look over the list I just sent & I will see
what I
>> can do. I think the only chance youve got with my cards are the promos.
>> Sorry but its all I got right now.
>> Gil

>Gil,

>Is there any reason whatsoever why you sent this publicly to the list?

> -== Loki ==-

*turns his Loki hitman card, inflicts 3 AP upon the street squatter Gil...

*snicker*
>>>>>Axlrose - ...<<<<<
Message no. 2
From: Bradley Aaron Rebh <brebh@*****.BGSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 22:57:58 -0500
On Sat, 14 Feb 1998, >>>>> Axlrose - ... <<<<< wrote:

> At 07:42 PM 2/14/98 -0800, you wrote:
> >---Gilbert Glaze <yleecoyote@*********.NET> wrote:
>
> >> I already have a set, but look over the list I just sent & I will see
> what I
> >> can do. I think the only chance youve got with my cards are the promos.
> >> Sorry but its all I got right now.
> >> Gil
>
> >Gil,
>
> >Is there any reason whatsoever why you sent this publicly to the list?
>
> > -== Loki ==-
>
> *turns his Loki hitman card, inflicts 3 AP upon the street squatter Gil...
>
> *snicker*
> >>>>>Axlrose - ...<<<<<
>
I think this mail was directed at me. :P

Don't @*****! him. I've almost done it, replying to a few posts to the
list myself.

Anyone have any good solo rules for the SRCG? I don't have anyone to play
with, but I love the game. It gets really old to see how many different
types of decks I can build. Later...X


-----------------------------------------
Bradley Aaron Rebh

brebh@*****.bgsu.edu
http://art.bgsu.edu/~rebh

920 E.Wooster #4
Bowling Green, OH 43402
419.353.2405
-----------------------------------------
Message no. 3
From: Wyrmy <elfman@*****.NET>
Subject: Re: [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 11:22:03 -0600
> Anyone have any good solo rules for the SRCG? I don't have anyone to play
> with, but I love the game. It gets really old to see how many different
> types of decks I can build. Later...X

I do! I have the same problem.What you do is first you put an objective
for you to do.then another deck ,if you have one,pull X(X meaning
how-ever many you want) cards and surround your objective.Then play
using the normal turn system.
Message no. 4
From: Bradley Aaron Rebh <brebh@*****.BGSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 23:35:53 -0500
On Sat, 14 Feb 1998, Wyrmy wrote:

> > Anyone have any good solo rules for the SRCG? I don't have anyone to play
> > with, but I love the game. It gets really old to see how many different
> > types of decks I can build. Later...X
>
> I do! I have the same problem.What you do is first you put an objective
> for you to do.then another deck ,if you have one,pull X(X meaning
> how-ever many you want) cards and surround your objective.Then play
> using the normal turn system.
>
How do you lose? Or do you just see if the runners you put together can
take the objective?

-----------------------------------------
Bradley Aaron Rebh

brebh@*****.bgsu.edu
http://art.bgsu.edu/~rebh

920 E.Wooster #4
Bowling Green, OH 43402
419.353.2405
-----------------------------------------
Message no. 5
From: Wyrmy <elfman@*****.NET>
Subject: Re: [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 11:39:56 -0600
> How do you lose? Or do you just see if the runners you put together can
> take the objective?
You lose if you can't take the objective and your entire deck is in the
trash pile.
Message no. 6
From: Bradley Aaron Rebh <brebh@*****.BGSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 23:55:32 -0500
On Sat, 14 Feb 1998, Wyrmy wrote:

> > How do you lose? Or do you just see if the runners you put together can
> > take the objective?
> You lose if you can't take the objective and your entire deck is in the
> trash pile.
>
Sounds interesting. I was trying to work out a way that I could take my
decks and play my own objectives and challenges against myself. The only
problem is cards like Yoshimo Chang. Why would I turn my own runners to
make my own runners not do anything for a turn. I guess could just play
without those cards, but that wouldn't really put my decks to the test if
i decided to play against real people. Not that this game was meant to be
played alone anyways. Oh well. :P

-----------------------------------------
Bradley Aaron Rebh

brebh@*****.bgsu.edu
http://art.bgsu.edu/~rebh

920 E.Wooster #4
Bowling Green, OH 43402
419.353.2405
-----------------------------------------
Message no. 7
From: Blade Hunter <bladehnt@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 00:05:10 -0500
On Sat, 14 Feb 1998, Wyrmy wrote:
> > How do you lose? Or do you just see if the runners you put together can
> > take the objective?
> You lose if you can't take the objective and your entire deck is in the
> trash pile.

Suggestion: place some kind of time limit on the game. Perhaps have all
the objectives have a built in "Dooms-Day Device" (or whatever that
objective is called on Loki's page of preview graphics).

But then, the solo game is still rather hollow...best with other players.

-me.
bladehnt@*********.net

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [OT] [ADMIN] Not again (was Re: Tag you're it), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!