Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Posting Decks (was Re: A little tact)
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 17:12:31 -0700
---Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM> wrote:
>
> Speaking of decks, does anyone have a deck they wanna post? I'm trying to
> find my current one, so I can, but if I can only remember where I put
> it..........

I've got a new build I'm planning to post. A deck I call "Electric Mayhem."
It's a combo deck of Deckers/Fuchi and Riggers/Roboplant.

However, I like to playtest the decks before I post 'em and I'm havind a dry
spell of getting anyone from the gang together to play. Between Tony, Asher
and Caric being members of my steady gaming group you'd think scheduling some
SRTCG playtime wouldn't be a problem. Still, it seems that since GC'98 it's
been pulling teeth to pin one of them down on cards, and even the weekly EDRPG
game had a scheduling fit this weekend.

I'll hold off just a bit longer to try and playtest it, otherwise I'll get the
deck posted for sure next weekend.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Shadowrun RPG 3rd Edition Playtester. SRTCG Playtester.
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Posting Decks (was Re: A little tact), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.