Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:27:18 +0100
Hi,

just 2 little questions.

1. Can S. use Skillsoft ?

2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot) ?

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 2
From: Earl Clay <ninjaboy007@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 01:42:47 PST
>Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:27:18 +0100
>Reply-To: Shadowrun Trading Card Game Discussion
> <SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
>From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
>Subject: Questions about Skwraaaark
>To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
>
>Hi,
>
>just 2 little questions.
>
>1. Can S. use Skillsoft ?
>
>2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot) ?
>
>OLAF
> ------------------------------------------------
> WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
> LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
I'd say-
1.He can use the skillwire cyberware but can't use the non-cyber gear it
takes to use them(the actual 'softs).
2. Pretty much it's the same. At least the spirit if not the letter of
the rules says Squaaaaark can't use a thing but cyberware, & can't
likely hold it or be equipped w/ it either.
P.S. Is that 4 or 5 aaaaaaa's...;)

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 3
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 11:49:12 +0100
Earl Clay schrieb:
> >Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:27:18 +0100
> >Reply-To: Shadowrun Trading Card Game Discussion
> > <SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET>
> >From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
> >Subject: Questions about Skwraaaark
> >To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >just 2 little questions.
> >
> >1. Can S. use Skillsoft ?
> >
> >2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot) ?
> >
> >OLAF
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
> > LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> I'd say-
> 1.He can use the skillwire cyberware but can't use the non-cyber gear it
> takes to use them(the actual 'softs).
> 2. Pretty much it's the same. At least the spirit if not the letter of
> the rules says Squaaaaark can't use a thing but cyberware, & can't
> likely hold it or be equipped w/ it either.
> P.S. Is that 4 or 5 aaaaaaa's...;)
>
About 1. I think so too but I tont think hold and use is the same(i.e. a mage can
hold 1000 spells but can only use the number of his skill).
There are not 4 or 5 AAAA there are 6 AAAAAA.

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 4
From: Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:32:11 PST
Hoi,

>Hi,
>
>just 2 little questions.
>
>1. Can S. use Skillsoft ?

No, while giving him a chipjack is cyberware... skillsofts are not they
are classified as miscelanious and as such cannot be deployed onto
squaaaark.


>2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot) ?

Not the same. Gear cannot be deployed onto squaaaark unless it has the
word cyberware on it. Sqaaaaark cannot hold other gear cards.

*** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
*** - Tao ***

Jayden Stormwalker
Donald Arganbright


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 5
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 18:40:24 +0100
Donald Arganbright schrieb:
> Hoi,
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >just 2 little questions.
> >
> >1. Can S. use Skillsoft ?
>
> No, while giving him a chipjack is cyberware... skillsofts are not they
> are classified as miscelanious and as such cannot be deployed onto
> squaaaark.
>
>
> >2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot) ?
>
> Not the same. Gear cannot be deployed onto squaaaark unless it has the
> word cyberware on it. Sqaaaaark cannot hold other gear cards.
>
> *** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
> *** - Tao ***
>
> Jayden Stormwalker
> Donald Arganbright
>
>
Ähhhmmm, isnt there writen on S. he can not USE other then .... ?

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 6
From: Mark Peterson <talos187@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 10:53:26 -0800
> Ähhhmmm, isnt there writen on S. he can not USE other then .... ?
> =

> OLAF

Somewhere in the rulebook it says that a runner cannot hold equipment he
cannot use. Otherwise, Skwa~rk would be the perfect filter.
-- =


peace be thy path,

talos landone
Message no. 7
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 22:38:18 +0100
Mark Peterson schrieb:
> > Ähhhmmm, isnt there writen on S. he can not USE other then .... ?
> >
> > OLAF
>
> Somewhere in the rulebook it says that a runner cannot hold equipment he
> cannot use. Otherwise, Skwa~rk would be the perfect filter.
> --
>
> peace be thy path,
>
> talos landone

The only think I have found in thre rules is that I only can play gear on runner
who have the required skill(s), but I dont know which skill I will need for a
Wabbits foot.On the otherwise you are right with the filter.

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 8
From: Tony Glinka <porthos@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 23:47:34 -0700
O.Kramer wrote:
>
> just 2 little questions.
>
> 1. Can S. use Skillsoft ?

From the SRTCG Q&A:
Skwraaaaaark!
Q1: According to the description of Skwraaaaaark! he can only use
gear/cyberware. Does this mean he can have a chipjack, but can't put
anything in it? A chipjack (versions 1-3) is listed as gear/cyberware
but skillsofts are listed as gear/misc. Since he can only use
gear/cyberware, he can't use the skillsofts making a chipjack useless or
illegal. ???? Are we reading this correctly?
A1: Yes you are. A chipjack on Skwraaaaaark! is useless.


> 2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot) ?

Other's have mentioned this in earlier posts, and I can't find the
reference off hand, but if a runner can't use the gear, he can't hold
it.


For these and all of your other SRTCG questions be sure and check out
the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's Official Unofficial FAQ.
URL: http://members.home.net/porthos/srtcg/sc_QandA.html

And remember if you sent in a question to FASA and got an answer from
them, be sure and forward both the question and answer on to me to add
to the Q&A. The Q&A doesn't work without your help.

Tony
--
Porthos@****.com -- GridSec: SRCard
Porthos' World of Shadowrun: http://members.home.net/porthos/sr/sr.html
Tony's SRTCG Site: http://members.home.net/porthos/srtcg/srtcg.html
Home of the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's Official Unofficial SRTCG FAQ
Message no. 9
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:30:16 +0100
Tony Glinka schrieb:
> O.Kramer wrote:
> >
> > just 2 little questions.
> >
> > 1. Can S. use Skillsoft ?
>
> >From the SRTCG Q&A:
> Skwraaaaaark!
> Q1: According to the description of Skwraaaaaark! he can only use
> gear/cyberware. Does this mean he can have a chipjack, but can't put
> anything in it? A chipjack (versions 1-3) is listed as gear/cyberware
> but skillsofts are listed as gear/misc. Since he can only use
> gear/cyberware, he can't use the skillsofts making a chipjack useless or
> illegal. ???? Are we reading this correctly?
> A1: Yes you are. A chipjack on Skwraaaaaark! is useless.
>
>
> > 2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot) ?
>
> Other's have mentioned this in earlier posts, and I can't find the
> reference off hand, but if a runner can't use the gear, he can't hold
> it.
>
Do a runner use a Wabbits foot ?



------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 10
From: Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:27:54 +0000
>Do a runner use a Wabbits foot ?

A Runner might, but Skwaaaaaark! cannot. Although I wish he could, as it
would have been nice to combat that Infected Chrome or Cyber Psychosis that
your opponent might have in his hand to play on you later.

I've had it done to me, and I had a LWF in my hand, but no other Runner to
play it on.

J
Message no. 11
From: Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:35:16 PST
Hoi,

<snip>

>> O.Kramer wrote:
>>
>> > 2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot)

Then Tony Wrote:

>> Other's have mentioned this in earlier posts, and I can't find the
>> reference off hand, but if a runner can't use the gear, he can't >>
>> hold it.

Then Olaf wrote yet again

>Do a runner use a Wabbits foot ?
>
Now the answer :)

This is sort of sticky ground on weither or not a runner uses gear
cards that are ment to be trashed. Does the holder of Bulldog van use
the van when it is trashed to go on another shadowrun? Does the runner
with the rapier use the bike when it is trashed to pull out, or enter a
shadowrun? Does the runner use the stimpatch when it is trashed to
heal? Some of these can be argued either way, but I believe that you
can only have one answer. It must be a yes or no. It really shouldn't
vary amoung the different cards. Other wise there will be alot of
justification time spent on why one card is allowed and the others to
not. This would be confusing and probably throw a lot of problems into
SRTCG relitivly easy game mechanincs.
Off hand my vote goes for YES the runner does use the gear cards,
even when that card is just trashed to use. This reasoning is because
certain cards like Squaaaaark become over powerful filters. Because it
would allow certain cards IE. Rapier to become too powerful. That and I
think it makes common sence. I'm holding an empty coke can. I trash it
at my local recycling center and gain 2 cents. I technacally used the
can to get the money. I wasn't just holding a can it suddenly
dissapeared and I found 2 cents in my pocket. I had to do something
with the can to generate the desired effect, thus using the gear.

Just my opinion

*** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
*** - Tao ***

Jayden Stormwalker
Donald Arganbright


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 12
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 21:39:36 +0100
Jon Edwards schrieb:
> >Do a runner use a Wabbits foot ?
>
> A Runner might, but Skwaaaaaark! cannot. Although I wish he could, as it
> would have been nice to combat that Infected Chrome or Cyber Psychosis that
> your opponent might have in his hand to play on you later.
>
> I've had it done to me, and I had a LWF in my hand, but no other Runner to
> play it on.
>
> J
So, if I understand you right a gear card that must be trashed to have an effect
is used(i.e. LWF, rapier....) ?
And if so, I`m right that I cant use a Bulldog van if S. is in the team ?

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 13
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 21:39:36 +0100
Donald Arganbright schrieb:
> Hoi,
>
> <snip>
>
> >> O.Kramer wrote:
> >>
> >> > 2. Is using gear the same like holding gear (i.e. Wabbit`s foot)
>
> Then Tony Wrote:
>
> >> Other's have mentioned this in earlier posts, and I can't find the
> >> reference off hand, but if a runner can't use the gear, he can't >>
> >> hold it.
>
> Then Olaf wrote yet again
>
> >Do a runner use a Wabbits foot ?
> >
> Now the answer :)
>
> This is sort of sticky ground on weither or not a runner uses gear
> cards that are ment to be trashed. Does the holder of Bulldog van use
> the van when it is trashed to go on another shadowrun? Does the runner
> with the rapier use the bike when it is trashed to pull out, or enter a
> shadowrun? Does the runner use the stimpatch when it is trashed to
> heal? Some of these can be argued either way, but I believe that you
> can only have one answer. It must be a yes or no. It really shouldn't
> vary amoung the different cards. Other wise there will be alot of
> justification time spent on why one card is allowed and the others to
> not. This would be confusing and probably throw a lot of problems into
> SRTCG relitivly easy game mechanincs.
> Off hand my vote goes for YES the runner does use the gear cards,
> even when that card is just trashed to use. This reasoning is because
> certain cards like Squaaaaark become over powerful filters. Because it
> would allow certain cards IE. Rapier to become too powerful. That and I
> think it makes common sence. I'm holding an empty coke can. I trash it
> at my local recycling center and gain 2 cents. I technacally used the
> can to get the money. I wasn't just holding a can it suddenly
> dissapeared and I found 2 cents in my pocket. I had to do something
> with the can to generate the desired effect, thus using the gear.
>
> Just my opinion
>
> *** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
> *** - Tao ***
>
> Jayden Stormwalker
> Donald Arganbright
>
Sounds logical for me.
Other question, who is using the bulldog van ? The runner who hold it or the team
that goes on the next run ?

OLAF

------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 14
From: Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 12:56:00 PST
Hoi,

>> >Do a runner use a Wabbits foot ?
>>
>> A Runner might, but Skwaaaaaark! cannot. Although I wish he could,
>> as it would have been nice to combat that Infected Chrome or Cyber >>
Psychosis that your opponent might have in his hand to play on you >>
later.
>>
>> I've had it done to me, and I had a LWF in my hand, but no other >>
Runner to play it on.
>>
>> J
>So, if I understand you right a gear card that must be trashed to >have
an effect is used(i.e. LWF, rapier....) ?

Correct

>And if so, I`m right that I cant use a Bulldog van if S. is in the
>team ?
>
>OLAF

Not quite. The runner who is holding the bulldog van is the runner who
uses the bulldog van. The text on the BV states that you can trash it
to send the runners on another shadowrun. So as long as BV was deployed
onto a leagel target runner (just about anyone) that runner can trash it
to send a team of 4 squaaaaaarks back onto another run. The squaaaaarks
are not the runner who used (trashed) the van. They just are the target
of the vans effect. Which is a valid play.

*** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
*** - Tao ***

Jayden Stormwalker
Donald Arganbright


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 15
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 22:21:28 +0100
Donald Arganbright schrieb:
> Hoi,
>
> >> >Do a runner use a Wabbits foot ?
> >>
> >> A Runner might, but Skwaaaaaark! cannot. Although I wish he could,
> >> as it would have been nice to combat that Infected Chrome or Cyber >>
> Psychosis that your opponent might have in his hand to play on you >>
> later.
> >>
> >> I've had it done to me, and I had a LWF in my hand, but no other >>
> Runner to play it on.
> >>
> >> J
> >So, if I understand you right a gear card that must be trashed to >have
> an effect is used(i.e. LWF, rapier....) ?
>
> Correct
>
> >And if so, I`m right that I cant use a Bulldog van if S. is in the
> >team ?
> >
> >OLAF
>
> Not quite. The runner who is holding the bulldog van is the runner who
> uses the bulldog van. The text on the BV states that you can trash it
> to send the runners on another shadowrun. So as long as BV was deployed
> onto a leagel target runner (just about anyone) that runner can trash it
> to send a team of 4 squaaaaaarks back onto another run. The squaaaaarks
> are not the runner who used (trashed) the van. They just are the target
> of the vans effect. Which is a valid play.
>
> *** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
> *** - Tao ***
>
> Jayden Stormwalker
> Donald Arganbright
>
This sounds not logical for me, but I have learned that I cant use logic if I´m
thinking about SRTCG.

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 16
From: Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 13:48:53 +0000
<snip>
>> Not quite. The runner who is holding the bulldog van is the runner who
>> uses the bulldog van. The text on the BV states that you can trash it
>> to send the runners on another shadowrun. So as long as BV was deployed
>> onto a leagel target runner (just about anyone) that runner can trash it
>> to send a team of 4 squaaaaaarks back onto another run. The squaaaaarks
>> are not the runner who used (trashed) the van. They just are the target
>> of the vans effect. Which is a valid play.
>>

>This sounds not logical for me, but I have learned that I cant use logic
if I´m
>thinking about SRTCG.

Okay, let me take a stab here....

Skwaaaaaark in and of himself cannot use a Bulldog Van. However, if
Skwaaaaaark is on a Running team with, let's say, Torgo, and Torgo has a
Bulldog Van, Torgo USES the Van to go on another Run. Skwaaaaaark, as he's
on the Running Team, takes advantage and goes on the next Run (as he is
part of the Running Team.)

Now, Skwaaaaark is benefitting from the Gear card, but is not actively
USING the card. It's like this: You're not allowed to drive or use my
Jeep. But you are allowed to ride in my Jeep when I'm driving it. Same
kind of thing. Skwaaaaaark isn't allowed to drive or use it, but he can be
a passenger. He just cannot be the Runner to initiate the use of the
Bulldog Van, as he cannot hold that card.

Like Donald said, it's a valid play.
Message no. 17
From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 23:00:41 +0100
Jon Edwards schrieb:
> <snip>
> >> Not quite. The runner who is holding the bulldog van is the runner who
> >> uses the bulldog van. The text on the BV states that you can trash it
> >> to send the runners on another shadowrun. So as long as BV was deployed
> >> onto a leagel target runner (just about anyone) that runner can trash it
> >> to send a team of 4 squaaaaaarks back onto another run. The squaaaaarks
> >> are not the runner who used (trashed) the van. They just are the target
> >> of the vans effect. Which is a valid play.
> >>
>
> >This sounds not logical for me, but I have learned that I cant use logic
> if I´m
> >thinking about SRTCG.
>
> Okay, let me take a stab here....
>
> Skwaaaaaark in and of himself cannot use a Bulldog Van. However, if
> Skwaaaaaark is on a Running team with, let's say, Torgo, and Torgo has a
> Bulldog Van, Torgo USES the Van to go on another Run. Skwaaaaaark, as he's
> on the Running Team, takes advantage and goes on the next Run (as he is
> part of the Running Team.)
>
> Now, Skwaaaaark is benefitting from the Gear card, but is not actively
> USING the card. It's like this: You're not allowed to drive or use my
> Jeep. But you are allowed to ride in my Jeep when I'm driving it. Same
> kind of thing. Skwaaaaaark isn't allowed to drive or use it, but he can be
> a passenger. He just cannot be the Runner to initiate the use of the
> Bulldog Van, as he cannot hold that card.
>
> Like Donald said, it's a valid play.

Ok, I understand. I have looked from the from side on it.
But what I not understand is how you put a Skwraaaaaark in a car, even it is a
bulldog van !!! ;))

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------
Message no. 18
From: David Reis <david.reis@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 15:03:56 -0800
"O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE> wrote:
>But what I not understand is how you put a Skwraaaaaark in a car, even it
is a
>bulldog van !!! ;))
>
Maybe he (it?) rides on top! :)

David
Message no. 19
From: tmphill <tmphill@******.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:38:27 -0700
David Reis wrote:

> "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE> wrote:
> >But what I not understand is how you put a Skwraaaaaark in a car, even it
> is a
> >bulldog van !!! ;))
> >
> Maybe he (it?) rides on top! :)
>
> David

New Card?

Roof Rack (Gear/Accessory)
Play on a vehicle. When that vehicle is present on a shadowrun, +1 runners
(i.e. 7) may participate in the run. Effect is cumulative.

Flavor: "The extra hands are great so long as we don't run into a minefield."

Art: Skrwaaaaaaark! bungie corded to the roof of a bulldog van ;).

Just an idea...not a very good one.

Travis


I know my personal address overwrites the list address. It can't be helped as
I email from work and it's set up so I can't modify it. Sorry.
Message no. 20
From: Matt Breton <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:52:08 -0600
On 10/26/98 16:38:27 tmphill@******.COM wrote:

>Roof Rack (Gear/Accessory)
>Play on a vehicle. When that vehicle is present on a shadowrun, +1 runners
>(i.e. 7) may participate in the run. Effect is cumulative.
>Flavor: "The extra hands are great so long as we don't run into a
minefield."
>Art: Skrwaaaaaaark! bungie corded to the roof of a bulldog van ;).

POT HOLE / Challenge (Outdoor)
Roll D6 for each Vehicle present. On a 5+, user takes one armor-piercing damage.
Any Runners on Roof Racks fall off -- each takes two damage and returns to the safehouse.
"Was that a 'bump' or a 'whump' we just hit?"

SUBURBAN SURFING / Objective
30 Reputation. No Indoor Challenges.
Vehicle Challenges deal double damage (!)
BONUS: For each Runner present thanks to a Roof Rack, gain 10 Reputation.


- Matt
Message no. 21
From: Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:02:07 +0000
>Roof Rack (Gear/Accessory)
>Play on a vehicle. When that vehicle is present on a shadowrun, +1 runners
>(i.e. 7) may participate in the run. Effect is cumulative.
>
>Flavor: "The extra hands are great so long as we don't run into a
minefield."
>
>Art: Skrwaaaaaaark! bungie corded to the roof of a bulldog van ;).
>
>Just an idea...not a very good one.


I don't know...I thought it was pretty damned funny! ;-)

And I KNOW I'd use it....
Message no. 22
From: Freak Finger <Freakfingr@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 22:00:07 EST
In a message dated 10/26/98 3:07:09 PM Pacific Standard Time,
david.reis@*****.COM writes:

<< O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE> wrote:
>But what I not understand is how you put a Skwraaaaaark in a car, even it
is a
>bulldog van !!! ;))
>
Maybe he (it?) rides on top! :)

David >>
------------------------

How bout a trailer hitch?
Freakfinger

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Questions about Skwraaaark, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!