Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Jon Palmer <jmp225@***.EDU>
Subject: Questions pt2
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:34:58 -0500
Another one:

Sleaze says "User may reset a triggered alarm on a d6 roll of 3+, but must
then face Challenge." Is that a case of bad wording, or does the DECKER
have to face the challenge? If it's the latter, maybe I'll start using
Tiny...

Jon Palmer
Message no. 2
From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions pt2
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 20:23:00 -0800
Jon Palmer wrote:
>
> Another one:
>
> Sleaze says "User may reset a triggered alarm on a d6 roll of 3+, but must
> then face Challenge." Is that a case of bad wording, or does the DECKER
> have to face the challenge? If it's the latter, maybe I'll start using
> Tiny...


The word from Mike is that the entire team can still face off against
the Challenge.


------------------------------------
With nomads I am numbered. -- E. MacColl

Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm
Message no. 3
From: Conrad Mikaelian <MLoki@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions pt2
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 13:11:14 EST
In a message dated 98-02-06 16:36:15 EST, you write:

<< Sleaze says "User may reset a triggered alarm on a d6 roll of 3+, but must
then face Challenge." Is that a case of bad wording, or does the DECKER
have to face the challenge? If it's the latter, maybe I'll start using
Tiny...
>>

Triggering the alarm happens after revealing the challange and before
encountering it. You can reset the alarm at that time by using sleaze but you
must still encounter the revealed challange before you can continue.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Questions pt2, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.