Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Jon Edwards <jonathan.edwards@*****.COM>
Subject: Fwd: Re: Shadowrun TCG Questions
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 11:45:49 -0800
Hola, Amigos.

After seeking some advice as to the appropriateness of this message to the
list, I am comfortable enough now to post the following response from
Fasa's Marketing folks (folk..given a company of 15, I'm sure it's probably
one person ;-) to my inquiry on whether or not they'd considered licensing
out Shadowrun.



--LETTER--

>In a message dated 11/16/98 12:54:19 PM, you wrote:
>
><<If FASA is not in a position to market and produce further expansions or
>units of Shadowrun, has thought been given as to licensing out the product
>to other companies such as WOTC?>>
>
>They would not be interested. It is too close to Net Runner in feel.
>If not, or the desire is not to have the game farmed out to such a large
>competitor, has thought been given to offering a limited license to produce
>with the currently developed Corp War expansion to a different third party
>organization?
>
>This is a pretty recent decision and few are in the card business anymore.
It
>takes over $150,000 to print and collate the expansion...then the third party
>would have to break through to distribution and retail problems and get it on
>the shelves in order to see any return. Our decision was really thought
>out...it just doesn't make sence to produce it given the current market. It
>pains us too....really. We had hoped we could continue with the game for we
>are incredibly proud of it.
>
>Thank you for your support.
>
>FASA
>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Shadowrun TCG Questions, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.