Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: rabiola <rabiola@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Wanted Question
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 10:56:06 -0600
OK, a Target Runner has been hit by a Wanted, and will be defeated.
Must the Attacker survive the attack to gain the Reputation?

Tony Rabiola rabiola@**.netcom.com
Fourth and Sixth World Adept
Still working on the Fifth...
Message no. 2
From: Tony Glinka <porthos@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Wanted Question
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:14:26 -0700
rabiola wrote:

> OK, a Target Runner has been hit by a Wanted, and will be defeated.
> Must the Attacker survive the attack to gain the Reputation?

This one is not in the SRTCG Q&A (another shameless plug) because it is
in FASA's FAQ.

From FASA's FAQ:

If my Runner attacks a "Wanted" Runner, and both Runners are trashed,
does my Runner
still get the Reputation points?

Yes. YOU get the Reputation points. Wanted should read "Player whose
Runner defeats Wanted
Runner earns Reputation equal to deployment cost of Wanted Runner".

Hope this helps.

Tony
--
Porthos@****.com -- GridSec: SRCard
Porthos' World of Shadowrun: http://members.home.net/porthos/sr/sr.html
Tony's SRTCG Site: http://members.home.net/porthos/srtcg/srtcg.html
Home of the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's Official Unofficial SRTCG FAQ
Message no. 3
From: "Jens P. DrÀger" <a1616@****.UNI-BAYREUTH.DE>
Subject: Re: Wanted Question
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 09:02:34 +0200
rabiola wrote:
>
> OK, a Target Runner has been hit by a Wanted, and will be defeated.
> Must the Attacker survive the attack to gain the Reputation?


I don't think so - we always played it the way that you just had to kill
the Target Runner (I think the card says "...if target runner is
defeated.." - and he's pretty much defeated if your runner kills him, no
matter what happens afterwards)

Jens P.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Wanted Question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!