Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Lodewijk Roskott <l.roskott@***.NL>
Subject: wanted v.s. green apple quicksteps
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:24:32 +0200
if a runner attacks my Wanted runner,and i play green apple quick steps
on the attacking runner,will the attack count as combat and will the
wanted be removed or will the wanted stay on the runner until another
runner attacks it?
Message no. 2
From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: wanted v.s. green apple quicksteps
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:48:47 -0800
---Lodewijk Roskott <l.roskott@***.NL> wrote:
>
> if a runner attacks my Wanted runner,and i play green apple quick
steps
> on the attacking runner,will the attack count as combat and will the
> wanted be removed or will the wanted stay on the runner until another
> runner attacks it?

According to the FASA FAQ or SRCard Q&A (I can't remember which one
right now). If an opponent is intercepting witha single Runner and you
GAQS him, it's as if the interception never took place and the run
continues on as normal.

IMHO the saem would apply to GAQSing the attacking Runner on a Wanted.
The attack never took place, so the Wanted card stays on your Runner.

Lood, your mailer is still overriding the list's Reply-To address with
your personal one.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 3/28/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about wanted v.s. green apple quicksteps, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!