Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Felix Hoefert <FHoefert@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Wheeler Question/ Language question
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 22:44:31 +0200
David Reis wrote:
>
> Here's a question about Wheeler that I couldn't find the answer to either
> in the FAQ on FASA's site or in the Q&A on Tony's site. The card text
> says, "When Wheeler is deployed, give him any Vehicle from your deck at no
> cost." Does this mean I can give him a vehicle no matter where it is (draw
> pile, trash pile, play hand, cards in play, fragged cards)? Technically
> they're all part of my deck.
>
YouŽre right - the deck is the whole thing, otherwise it would read
trash pile or draw pile. IŽd exclude the fragged pile, though.
I have a question (quite simple, but I canŽt convince myself): Is it
"IŽd" or "IŽld" for "I would"?

Felix
Message no. 2
From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Wheeler Question/ Language question
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 03:18:18 -0700
Felix Hoefert wrote:

> You´re right - the deck is the whole thing, otherwise it would read
> trash pile or draw pile. I´d exclude the fragged pile, though.
> I have a question (quite simple, but I can´t convince myself): Is it
> "I´d" or "I´ld" for "I would"?

I'd.

Occasionally, you'll see "I'd've" (for "I would have") which leads one
to the rather ridiculous looking (let alone unpronounceable!)
contraction, "I'd'nt've" (which should be obvious as to meaning).


- Matt

------------------------------------
The truth will set you free - but first it's gonna piss you off.
- Kanya Vashon McGhee

GridSec: SRCard / Freedonian Research Assistant
Teen Poets FAQ: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mbreton/poetry/poetfaq.htm
SRTCG Website: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/2189/ccgtop.htm

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Wheeler Question/ Language question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.