Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Justin and HTML (was Re: [SRTCG] Uncle Joe...)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 18:06:54 -0700
---Justin Marcinkus wrote:
>
> The Chipjack 2 essence loss is only 2. It would make "sense" to me
that
> Uncle Joe suffers from essence loss, since he has cyberware.
However, I
> tend to agree with Bull and follow that if it doesn't say it on the
card,
> it ain't happenin'. That is, unless FASA comes out with an errata.
>
<HR>
<html><head></head><BODY
bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p><font size=2
color="#000000" face="Arial"><br><br>> >Does the
built-in Chipjack-2
which Uncle Joe has automatically lower his<br>> >Essence to a 4 or is
it completely free of charge(nuyen and essence)?<br>> ><br>> Unless
it
says on the card that he has a lower essence, than no.<br>>
Othwerwise, how would someone who doesn;t have a Chipjack 2 know what
the<br>> essence loss was?<br><br>The Chipjack 2 essence loss is only
2. It would make "sense" to me that Uncle Joe suffers from essence
loss, since he has cyberware. However, I tend to agree with Bull and
follow that if it doesn't say it on the card, it ain't happenin'. That
is, unless FASA comes out with an errata.</p>
</font></body></html>

Justin, I'm getting your messages with an HTML attachment that
duplicates the message. (See above.)

I don't know if anyone else is experiencing this, but I wanted to make
you aware of it. Can you check your mailing program for any strange
settings?

===
@>--,--'--- Loki

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.