From:	Rob Harris <rjharris@********.UIUC.EDU>
Subject:	Re: Quicky about the 6 Obj.'s
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 1997 11:49:28 -0700

Who said there was a MAXIMUM of 6 Objectives? The way I read the rulebook,
is that you have a 60 card deck minimum and a 6 objective minimum. It would
be hard to play a really big game otherwise, plus there is some neat things
you can do with a slightly bigger objective deck!

----------
> From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
> To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Subject: Re: Quicky about the 6 Obj.'s
> Date: Wednesday, September 03, 1997 7:17 PM
>
> Andrew Payne III wrote:
> >
> > Does the 4 card rule apply to the 6 Objectives you need? I think it
> > does but I had an idea about a cake walk/media chick deck and wanted
> > to
> > ask.
>
> The four-card rule gets mentioned before the cards are split up between
> Objective pile and Playing Deck, so I'd imagine so. (I personally go
> with just one of each Objective to leave this sort of silly deck
> hopeless.)
>
> As it is, in a hundred-point game, your four Cake Walks only total up to
> forty points, meaning your other *two* Objectives have to be
> thirty-pointers. I'm in the process of creating a similar deck, but I
> won't spoil you with my evil ideas :)