From:	Andrew Payne III <smiling_bandit@**********.COM>
Subject:	I have been playing wrong (was-Re: Card of the Blank: Sucker Run)
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 1997 11:30:01 -0700

---Matb wrote:
>
> Andrew Payne III wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I am just missing a pretty obvious use. (for sucker run)
> >
>
> Sounds like you nailed the concept right on the head. Worthwhile if
> you keep a Cover Up so people think you're serious about what it is.

> Also, you can put non-Challenge cards on it (as bluffs), which you
> might see as being better than trashing them from your hand.
>

Take a look at what I found in the FAQ.

--- Tony Glinka wrote under the subject "RE: Sucker Run...Why?"
> I had in my set once and only once. It was a two player game and
> was one of the first times I played and it happened to come up as my
> first objective. Of course, I had stacked a bunch of nice and nasty
> challenges on it before I flipped it. My opponent did not have any
> challenges and so he had placed a bunch of bluffs down. So when it
> was flipped I let some nice bug vocabulary words and lost all those
> get challenges to the trash pile. I was pissed. My opponent
laughed.

I have been playing where you shuffle your objectives and pull the top
one, look at it and then put it face down on the table.

When I origanally looked at Tony's message I thought he was playing
wrong. Boy was I wrong, see the FAQ Q&A below. To me this makes
Evaluate a definite card in any deck with Sucker Run.

FAQ Question
Q: Can I look at my Objective before I put it into play face down?
A: No. If you accidentally see the Objective that you are putting
into
play, shuffle it back into the rest of your Objectives and choose
another.



===
Andrew Payne III
smiling_bandit@**********.com
http://www.oakland.edu/~ddmccoll/sr



_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com