Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Forrest Houston <fhouston@****.ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Identical Boosters and Starters
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 16:18:16 -0400
I just opened a box of starters and a box of boosters last night and had a
similar experience. I opened the starters first so if there was a pattern
there I didn't pick up on it. However, out of the 31 rares (2 of the
starters had 2 rares and 1 extra uncommon, 3 had 4 rares and 1 less uc) 4
of them were duplicated (for a total of 8). I guess it's a common problem
with distribution where they don't anticipate that people might buy things
a box at a time.

The boosters though were really disappointing. I didn't find any that
matched card for card, but I did see that sequences of cards seemed to go
together. Such that 90% of the time an Elvish Hitman would be followed by
a Chipjack1 which was followed by a Luck o' the Irish, etc...(these aren't
the exact combos, but you get the point). The biggest disappoint though
was 9 of the 36 boosters had duplicate commons within the booster. Such
that there was c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c1 c2 c3 c4 u1 u2 u3 u4 r1 (rarity/card
number). So while everything balanced out based on the number of cards
that I bought (gotta love wholesale :-) ) if I had been buying a single
pack or two I would have been REALLY ah... "upset" shall we say ;-)


Just my $0.02
Forrest


> [snip]
> This is not an isolated incident, it has happened to a few friends as
> well... and the same thing occurs in boosters.... 12 cards are
> identical, even to the extreme of location within the booster and the
> only difference is the rare and uncommons.... that is very sad... as in
> lame.
>
> LadyDeath[AMMO]
> http://ammo.mgl.ca/lady
>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.