Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Fwd: SRTCG question on Sleazing
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 20:27:35 -0700
OK guys, here's the answer to that whole sleazing/lock-down question
brought on by the Motion Dectors and Gut Check thread. Looks like
FASA agrees that skill based sleazing and card text sleazing are two
seperate things. :o)

---FASACorp2@***.com wrote:
>
> Once Motion Detectors and Red Alert are played, Challenges cannot be
sleazed.
> However, cards like Feeding Ghouls and Gut Check! are, indeed, an
exception
> to this. As you point out, not being able to get past Gut Check! on a
> successful roll makes no sense (and we are counting on people to use
some
> common sense in such situations. We don't want the game to become as
> convoluted as Magic can be.)
>
> Sleep spell would also work against Objectives defended by Red Alert
and
> Motion Detectors.
>
> There's a comment in your e-mail message that we are behind
answering mail.
> As this answer will probably go up on the web, I want to point out
why we're
> behind. We've received over 300 questions already! The only people
at FASA
> (at the moment) qualified to answer these questions are the SRTCG
game
> designers and we are also busy working on 50 new cards for the second
> printing and 150 new cards for the first expansion. We promise to do
our best
> to keep up with questions but we also want to keep bringing you new
cards
> (and to sleep, at least occassionally).
>
> Thanks for all of the interest!
>
> Jim Nelson

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament


_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.