From:	Forrest <eness@**********.COM>
Subject:	Re: "Attached" Challenges
Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:07:46 -0700

---Steve Kramarsky <steve@***.COM> wrote:
>
> >The way I have been handling it is this way. After a Challenge is
> >revealed you read the cards text. If the text says that it attaches
> >itself to the objective then you remove it from the Challenge stack
> >and place it on the objective. Since it is now no longer in the
> >Challenge stack you may place another challenge in the now open
slot.
> >Since the Challenge is not attached to the objective until you
reveal
> >it, it still counts toward the challenge stacks limit.
>
> I agree. Incidentally we've been playing that challenges 'attached'
> to an objective effect all runs against it by any plater
> INCLUDING the player who played the challenge.
>
> -S.
>

I thought that is how it was supposed to be. Come to think of it
though I guess it could go the other way as well, since it is one of
your challenges you don't have to face it. I kind of like it the way
we've been playing it. It adds a little more strategy into both the
deck design and game play.

Forrest


_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com