From:	Logan Graves <logan1@*****.INTERCOM.NET>
Subject:	Re: "Attached" Challenges
Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 1997 20:27:40 -0400

(>) In our last one, Brett Barksdale wrote:

>me>In responce to my post:

>me>Answer: Yes. You never face your own objectives unless forced to by
>me>a card.
>
> . . . it should say you never face your own CHALLENGES unless
> forced to by a card. (not objectives - you can freely run on your own
> objective in play).

Yes, "CHALLENGES," I agree. I'd never noticed that before.
Must be a typo.

> In short, I agree that if I play Motion Detectors on an objective and
> my opponent sets it off, any time I run against his challenges on that
> same objective, I am forced to deal with the implications of the
> Motion Detectors as well.

I don't have one of these, so no idea on the official ruling here,
either. But there are a number of other cards that force ya to face yer
own challenges. Otherwise you can safely ignore them during your run (&
trash 'em afterwards).

(>) --Fenris

______________________________________________logan1@*****.intercom.net
(>) Ares Arms: We're Number One! (Just give us the
name and address of anyone who disagrees.)
(>) --Ares Slogan