Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: I was slaughtered
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 04:15:28 -0700
> When he didn't have Lord Torgo out., I could deal with him fairly
> well, but afterwards I didn't stand a chance (that Browse is annoying
> too). My questions are:

Lord Torgo, quite frankly, is a sick card, even if you took away his
anti-elf ability (why oh why!)

> Q: What can I do to kill Lord Torgo?
> -I haven't the pilots for Driveby, and he never gets hurt anyway
> -with his Browse, Torgo never pulls out of a run, and even if he did,
> I'd have to spend a fortune for a CHANCE of using bounty hunter.

Bad Lunch may leave Lord of the Torgo Pit indisposed for awhile. A
Rough Night or two (you *can* play more than one in a turn, even though
it doesn't make "Realworld" sense) may bring him down low enough for a
large critter to essen him. Getting your own Torgo out prevents him
entirely. Aztechnology.. argh, I'm slipping into the rares.

> Q: The Rapier says "Outdoor". Does this mean it can ONLY be used on
> Outdoor Challenges, or CAN'T be used on Indoor Challenges?

My understanding was that Indoor Challenges only allowed Indoor and
non-aligned effects (in otherwords, it eliminates outdoor stuff.)

> Q: What can I do against browse that doesn't involve Rare cards (like
> my Sec Decker) and gives me more than a 50% chance?

Uhh.. Red Alert is a rare too.. Fielding your own deckers (with Black
Hammer or Hawg) is the only quick one I can think of. Or, of course,
Drive-bying, Riotsing, or Bad Lunching the deckers too.

> Q: Does the Ally spirit count against the number of Spirits a Shaman
> can use?

I usually assume not, but I'd wait to hear from FASA.

> Q: Who has spells they can trade with me? :)

I do! Email me a trade list.

> -=SwiftOne=-
> Brett Borger
> SwiftOne@***.edu
> AAP Techie

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.