Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: A Challenge for you all
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 12:26:47 -0700
---Lady Jestyr wrote:
>
> So, how would you people go about building a deck like this? Mostly
> commons, with a couple of uncommons thrown in - say, no more than 10
> uncommons (not including objectives). Let me hear it, people!

Caric came by the other day and we decided to play a few games. He'd
forgotten his deck, so I decided to test an idea I had oc a
commons/uncommons deck. There's only about 6 uncommons in the deck
itself (not counting Objectives). I slapped it together in about 10
minutes from extras in my trade box, but the deck has shown itself to
be a pretty decent one.

I call it Common Occurences. :o)

OBJECTIVES
- Harlequin's Game
- Sucker Run
- Tiki Head Enigma
- Ragnarock (x3)

DECK PROPER (70 Cards)
Runners
- Ajax (x4)
- D-Day
- Glitz (x4)
- Gore Tusk
- Hatchetman
- Kromagnus (x4)
- Shasta (x4)
- Stomper

Gear
- Bolt of Power (x3)
- Crawler Patrol Drone
- Hunter Drone (x2)
- Katana (x4)

Contacts
- Bounty Hunter
- Corporate Secretary
- Elven Hitman

Locations
- The Iron Lung

Challenges
- Ambushed En Route
- Basilisk (x2)
- Electrified Fence (x2)
- Feeding Ghouls (x2)
- Gut Check
- Hellish Traffic
- Lone Star Patrol (x4)
- Maglocks (x4)
- Security Drone (x4)
- Security Guards (x4)
- Sentry Gun

Stingers
- Green Apple Quicksteps (x4)
- No Way Out (x2)

Specials
- Bar Fight
- Block Party (x2)
- Cover Up

This is a cash deck (Rockera w/ Fame and Ragnarock). Thus, you'll note
the presence of pumpable challenges, the security drone that can deal
DMG first for 3Y, Block Parties to stall opponents if need be, and the
Bounty Hunter (especially in my favorite combo with Maglocks or GAQS).

-== Loki ==-
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.