From:	Forrest <eness@**********.COM>
Subject:	Re: Deckers and Multi-Player Games
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 1997 19:34:25 -0700

---Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM> wrote:
>
[snip]
> > In our multi-player games, we have found that it is much more fun
to
> > play the game with modified Interception rules--each objective can
> > have a shadowrun intercepted on it once per PLAYER rather than once
> > per GAME.
> > This makes play much more interesting for three and especially four
> > player games in our experience.
>
> Oh, I agree entirely with this. But allowing only one Interception
> prevents confusion, though - otherwise, what happens when two players
> want to intercept the same run? (Actually, in a multiplayer
game,what
> happens anyway? D6 time?)
>

I would think that the person who owns the target objective gets "the
rite of first refusal" so to speak. If they don't take it I would
think it is up to them to decide which of the other two can intercept
(assuming both want to). This is based on the fact that the objective
owner gets to pick which challenge stack is faced first. In informal
games though maybe a roll of between the interested parties would be
better.

Random thoughts...
Forrest
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com