Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Todd M. Behringer" <billykid@******.COM>
Subject: Re: Questions about ADAM BOMB
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 22:26:38 -0500
Loki wrote:

> ---"Todd M. Behringer" wrote:
> >
> > Ok now that I have some of these cards, I'm looking for some
> > clarifications to some ruling questions I have. Sorry if any of
> this is
> > duplicate or stirs up any old flame wars, but here it goes!
> >
>
> I would say each set of damage is doled out seperately, and thus yes
> it would be cumulative to those taking it. (I wouldn't want to be in
> your safehouse just waiting for those little buggers to blow.

Awwww come on! You play with fire long enuff, your gonna get burned! I
was considering it more as a money making opportunity, and thought about a
deck that requires lots of money to screw with an opponent.

Besides, if I understand this right then (probably not) wouldn't AB be a
great card to intercept a shadowrunning team. If he stops them, he dies
(assuming enough damage to him) then all your opponents cards who went on
the run take 5 damage as well?? Is this correct? If so, seems like a
pretty good way to take out a group of runners!

> Also Todd, your Reply-To field is overriding the List's address.
>

Ummmm, so how do I fix that? I don't get to see my own messages, so I had
no idea it was happening, now that I know, I don't know how to fix it.

More food for thought. If the new release is comming out in November, that
means we have less than a month to complete our sets before we try to
complete the new set! SIGH, and here I thought I was saving money when I
quit MTG! I guess those college loans can wait a few more years! :^)

Todd M. Behringer | billykid@******.com
http://www.execpc.com/~billykid

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.