Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Forrest <eness@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Multi-player games / House rules (was: Re: Deckers and
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 05:25:46 -0700
---Jeroen de Wijn <J.Wijn@*********.NL> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Yes, and believe me that's just about the only way you can play
> it in multiplayer.
> We play almost exclusively multiplayer between 3-6 player games.
> We tried to experiement with interception rules, but that resulted
> in total deadlocks, where noone would lay down challenges, and
> noone would run.
> And since multiplayer games last 2-3 hours as it is......
>
6 players! Wow... I was wondering about that the other day, how to
handle more than 4 players (not that the situation has ever come up
here). With the way the rules are now you have either 3 or 4
challenges on each objective. So with 6 does everyone get to play a
challenge, leaving you with atleast 5 to face on each run? If this is
the case I can see where you would spend 2-3 hours/game. It seems
like it would almost be worth running through the draw deck once to
build "The Team" and accumulate some money. Then reshuffling the
trash and actually play the game :-)



> We are currently contemplating another experiment: a maximum of
> 4 challenges on each objective with 5 or 6 players.
> This could prove to be a necessity, as one Lone Star Patrol managed
> to wipe out a COMPLETE runner team, including Skwaaarg the other
> day by being pumped with 27 NuY. Auch!

I would imagine that 3-4 challenges/objective is probably the optimum
number. Unless you start looking at challenges before going on the
run (recon, browse, etc) and can customize your team, typically 3 is
when you really start to "feel it". Atleast that's what I've found in
my experience. Then again, as I've stated before, I prefer the muscle
type decks. So it's not unusual to go on a run and attempt to just
plow through the challenges, losing 1 or 2 runners along the way.
Using Shopping Cart Lady to save the gear, and Mr. Johnson to get
replacement runners for the next run :-)

Forrest
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.