Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Some card ideas
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 00:54:21 -0700
---Tony Glinka wrote:
>
> Loki wrote:
>
> > ---Loki wrote:
> > >
> > > Vitas III
> > > Type: Special
> > > Cost 6
> > > Notes: Roll D6 for each Runner in play (+1 if Runner possesses
> > > Stamina). 1-4 trash Runner. 5+ Runner remains in play.
> >
> > I forgot to add I'm considering Vitas III should be Unique.
>
> That's one harsh card. 1-4 trash runner? Ouch. Being one who
plays
> with the Big and Uglies I would feel that runners with a high body
would
> be less susceptible to the disease.

Actually I thought Stamina was more of a factor on that, thus why I
gave it a +1 to the die roll.

The card is there to help thin out the Big and Uglies with their
bodies of 7-9 and (A1 or A2). These guys don't even go down often on
runs and just tend to linger throughout the entire game.

The card is a 6 nu yen special and Unique, puts it in the class with
False Mentor. :o) It's supposed the be a harsh card (keep in mind
it'll take your runners as well as your opponents), I guess you could
think of it as the Wrath of God for the SRTCG.

'Course a LotI or Wabbits foot might stop Vitas III in it's tracks.
Ghost Who Walks would be immune to it, and Dodger may not even be
touched...

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
SRTCG trade lists last updated 9/18/97

_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.