Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Some card ideas
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:01:22 -0700
---James Poppe wrote:
>
> Very interesting ideas, but I'm worried about the effectiveness of
Ritual
> Sorcery and Link, especially considering the amount damage that it
does in
> the RPG. (ah the times when I've geeked the overanxious player for
being
> stupid).

Think of it though. I have three Shasta's out and Ritual Link your
Runner. I can tap them to do 6 pts of damage to him during a given
legwork phase. Hmmm... perhaps I should specify armor piercing damage.
Also I can't see this damamge could be intercepted by a runner with
guard. Back to the drawing board for changes. :o)

> Vitas III, now that I know it would be Unique, is very interesting.

Thank-you.

> what about something like
>
> Power Focus
> Type: Gear/Magic/Accessory
> Cost: 5
> Notes: Requires Sorcery, Adds +2 to all die roll regarding spell
damage/strength

Instand Dr. Apocalypse... just add Power Focus and stir.

> Weapon Focus
> Type:Gear/Magic/Accessory
> Cost: 6
> Notes: Requires Sorcery, Adds +2/+2 to runner

Interesting. Might tie in with the expansion set the introduces phys
ads as well.

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
SRTCG trade lists last updated 9/18/97
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.