Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Some card ideas
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:49:50 -0700
---Brett Borger wrote:
>
> > Ritual Sorcery
> > Type: Special
> > Cost: 3
> > Notes: Turn Runner you control with Sorcery to inflict X damage on
any
> > Runner in play. X = Sorcery + 1.
>
> Nice, but as much as I think we need some direct damage, this looks
> a little cheap...I'd say go to 4 or 5.

T gave it the same cost as Drive-By which does 3 points flat out. Keep
in mind most of your mages only have sorcery 1 or 2 which means they'd
to 2 or 3 points with the card. A rare number may be able to do 4.

> > Ritual Link
> > Type: Special
> > Cost: 4
> > Notes: Play on Runner in play. Owner of Ritual Link may turn
mages he
> > controls during his Legwork phase to deal X damage to linked
runner. X
> > = Sum of mages' Sorcery skill.
>
> When does Ritual Link go away?

Same as Infected Chrome, when the runner dies or gets rid of the
Special somehow (LotI or Wabbits Foot).

> > Vitas III
> > Type: Special
> > Cost 6
> > Notes: Roll D6 for each Runner in play (+1 if Runner possesses
> > Stamina). 1-4 trash Runner. 5+ Runner remains in play.
> (And Unique).
>
> Don't forget to give abonus to dwarves.

Good call. Maybe it should read: +1 for dwarves or if Runner possesses
Stamina. This would also be cumulative, so a dwarf with Stamina stays
in on a roll of 3+.

===
-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
SRTCG trade lists last updated 9/18/97
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.