Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Forrest <eness@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: BKK card idea
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:06:56 -0700
---Logan Graves <logan1@*****.INTERCOM.NET> wrote:
>
> (>) Here is the one I sent to Skuzzy & Jim on 7-Sep-97:
>
> It's a "Location" (duh!)
> _________________________________________________________
> BIG KNOBI KLUB (3¥ to deploy) Street Location
> 3¥: Turn a runner to roll D6. (+1 for Leadership or Social)
> 1-2: Sold Out Concert! You can't get in.
> 3-4: Not on the guest list. You may pay +1¥ to roll again.
> 5-6: You may take a Runner from your draw pile & deploy
> it at no cost. (Player may not return to the Klub
> until completing a Shadowrun with this new runner).
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Comments? Suggestions? Playability issues?
>

This might make it too limiting for use, but it would give it more
flare I think....

_________________________________________________________
BIG KNOBI KLUB (3¥ to deploy) Street Location
2¥: Turn a ROCKER to roll D6. (+1 for Leadership or Social)
<2: Sold Out Concert! You can't get in poser...
3-4: Not on the guest list. You may pay 1¥ to roll again.
5-6: You may take a ROCKER from your draw pile & deploy
it at no cost.
7+: RIOTS! Trash Big Knobi Klub
_________________________________________________________

Differences:
- cost has been dropped, and runner type specified (we needed one for
rockers anyway)
- upper and lower "open ended" limits have been defined (for Loaded
Dice and other such things)
- Negative effects on the high and low end. I like these kind of
cards because they don't allow you to dump a lot Loaded Dice on it for
a "sure thing".

As I said it may limit it from the original design, but I think it
gives it a better "flavor".

Forrest
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.