Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Brett Borger <bxb121@***.EDU>
Subject: My GAQ Solution
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:46:02 +0000
I've seen a lot of complaints about GAQ and whether it is
retroactive. FASA really seems to be trying to avoid timing issues
(which have killed Magic(tm). ) I even saw an ad in Inquest (I was
getting Hatchetman 2057, of course [all other cards were gone already
:( ] [BTW, Why is HM 2057 so much WORSE than Hachetman the common?
Sure, you can pump him out the wazoo, but he doesn't compare to his
former self without 8-10 points of cyber. (since you could put 6
points on his former self) Anyway, I digress.] The ad went
something like "If you hate rules lawyering, come play SRTCG".

My solution to the GAQ trouble is the same as what FASA has done in
combat....There, combat/damage is all one instantaneous step. I say
that revealing the Challenge/Sleasing is all one instantaneous step.
(Security Camera is a semi-exception. If Sec Cam is revealed, and
not sleazed, I have a chance to GAQ you before laying down the new
challenge)

Thus, GAQ is not retroactive, and can be used at any time, assuming
that "time" isn't instantaneous.

comments?




Brett Borger
SwiftOne@***.edu
AAP Techie

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.