Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: [COW] Challenge replacing Objectives << Nets?
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 17:00:35 -0400
At 11:59 AM 9/15/97 -0700, Robert Lamb wrote these timeless words:
>Bull said...
> <<SNIP>>
>
>> Also, there are others that are really tough to beat. Nets, Gut
>> Check, a
>> Fresh Chomps 2000... the list goes on... Sure, it's nice to beat the
>> shit
>> out your runners with the big dragon, but sometimes it's more than
>> enough
>> to simply stop him.
> <<SNIP>>
>
> I've seen several people mention Nets on the list. Admittedly,
>I've been burned with bad rolls, but whenever I've included it in my
>deck, it hasn't seemed very usefull. You've got to roll for each
>runner, right? So you only have a 1 in 3 chance of sending a particular
>runner home (untapped at that). Bad odds aside (groan), I've never
>actually seen it send anyone home when I've used it. Maybe I should be
>more patient and throw it back in :).
>
Actually, it's normally 2 in 3, only 1 in three if they have athletics,
which quite a few runners don;t...

And the card sucks at the bottem of the deck, but stick it on top of one of
the big nasties, like the Fire Elemental or the Dracoform, and just watch
the runners get crushed after half the team gets sent home! :]

It's not a great solo card, and not reliable when it's the last Challenge
in the stack, as usually at least one runner slips through, but still not a
bad card, and nowhere near as weak or lame as some of them...

> Thoughts?
>
You got 'em :]

Bull
--
Bull, aka Steven Ratkovich, aka Rak, aka a lot of others! :]

The Offical Celebrity Shadowrn Mailing List Welcome Ork Decker!
Fearless Leader of the Star Wars Mailing List
List Flunky of ShadowCreations, creators of the Newbies Guide,
in production now!
HOME PAGE: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604/home.html

"Whoever invented solataire is one sadistic son of a bitch"
-- Me, after spending 2 hours trying to win a game

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.