Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: 4th Bunch of Questions
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:16:45 -0700
---Matb wrote:
>
> > > Sudden realization: GAQ is utterly useless against Red Widow.
>
> > Not true. If she's already turned to go on the shadowrun, and then
> > summarily gets GAQ'd (which doesn't say she returns to safe house
> > unturned) she wouldn't be able to turn to join the run again.
>
> Oof - good call. I'd gotten it into my mind she was a Serra Widow.
> The GAQ bit is actually good on her at any time.
>
> OTOH - is she immune to Nets? Nets sends her back to the safehouse
> unturned; she immediately turns to rejoin her buddy Macabre who made
it
> through ok.

Hmmm... Interesting. I don't see why technically that wouldn't work.

> She'd be (more) fun if you could send her on any shadowrun in
progress -
> I've been getting into this "cooperative shadowrun" mindset lately.

The FASA FAQ 2.0 says you can use Yamaha Rapier to join an opponents
shadowrun, so I'd say Red Widow could too. However, this wouldn't be
to your advantage unless in team-play. The rep earned from the run is
still going to your opponent, and if he's not on your team guess who's
gonna suffer from Booby Traps and Manticores? ;o)

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

"You're calling me Bitch like it's a bad thing."
--> CrapGame during the Drive in the Country tournament

_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.