Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: 4th Bunch of Questions
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 08:20:38 -0700
> > > > Sudden realization: GAQ is utterly useless against Red Widow.

> > > Not true. If she's already turned to go on the shadowrun, and then
> > > summarily gets GAQ'd (which doesn't say she returns to safe house
> > > unturned) she wouldn't be able to turn to join the run again.

> > Oof - good call. I'd gotten it into my mind she was a Serra Widow.

Carp me for the MtG references. I'll behave now.

> > The GAQ bit is actually good on her at any time.

> > OTOH - is she immune to Nets? Nets sends her back to the safehouse
> > unturned; she immediately turns to rejoin her buddy Macabre who made
> it through ok.

> Hmmm... Interesting. I don't see why technically that wouldn't work.

I knew she was immune to something. Maybe they should rename Nets to
Webs in her honor?

> > She'd be (more) fun if you could send her on any shadowrun in
> progress - I've been getting into this "cooperative shadowrun" mindset
lately.

> The FASA FAQ 2.0 says you can use Yamaha Rapier to join an opponents
> shadowrun, so I'd say Red Widow could too. However, this wouldn't be
> to your advantage unless in team-play. The rep earned from the run is
> still going to your opponent, and if he's not on your team guess who's
> gonna suffer from Booby Traps and Manticores? ;o)

"You can't do this to me! I sleazed you past the Sentry Guns!
Nooooooo!"

I just have this odd situation in mind where my "left-hand wingman" goes
on a run; as his heros are Booby Trapped and Barney Phyffed away, I send
in Widow and the Rapier folk, so eventually I'm the only one with
Runners at the end :) It'd make for a fun Objective - "Mass Melee" or
whatever they call those free-for-all wrestling matches.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.