Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Andrew Payne III <smiling_bandit@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: [Legal] Card ideas
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:58:15 -0700
---Nemein wrote:
>
> ---Andrew Payne III <smiling_bandit@**********.COM> wrote:
> [snip]
> > >
> > > Overall, I don't expect to see this as a major issue.
> > >
> >
> > I did not think it would be, I thought of it as I was checking out
> > Nemien/forrest's web page with cards thought up on this list.
> >
>
> Yeah I hadn't really thought of it either. The only other game where
> I got involved in the design phase of it I'm pretty sure (can't
really
> recall it was a couple of years ago) that the person asked me if he
> could use the cards, or I told him to use them if he liked them. I
> guess the major thing would be if anyone wanted to make an issue of
> it. I have a feeling that most people here would be more excited
over
> having a card used than trying to get "their share" of the profit.
>

I would be excited but, I wouldn't mind (a) signed copy(ies) of the
card(s) used. Z:o)

>
> Just my feelings.
>
> If people would prefer, I'll take the "list idea page" down until we
> get an answer. Actually since I don't have a counter or access to
the
> logs I'm not even sure if anyone has looked at it yet :-)
>

I have looked at it at added all the card I did not have in my
database in my database. I do not think you should take it down until
we find out one way or the other how FASA feels about it.

===
Andrew Payne III
smiling_bandit@**********.com
http://www.oakland.edu/~ddmccoll/sr






_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.