From:	Nemein <eness@**********.COM>
Subject:	Re: Some specific rules questions
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:27:19 -0700

---Rob Harris <rjharris@********.UIUC.EDU> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> 1) Indirect Fire - When a Runner turns to provide 'Indirect Fire'
> during a run, does he add the
> weapons power for the rest of the combats in that run, or only for
> that one combat?
>
As I understand it, just the one combat


>
> 2) Cyberware - Cyberware says specifically that it can not be
> replaced, removed, or swapped once given to a specific runner. Can it
> be removed by the challenge Street Scum?
>
OUCH! :-) "Come here kid, let me relieve you of that cyberarm" I
would say no.

>
> a) If it can be, then what point is that statement? Is there
> another card that removes equipment?
>
I can't think of one off hand, I don't have a list with me though.

>
> b) If it can't, do you include it in the random draw of
> equipment, or do you just set it aside so that there is always SOME
> viable equipment destroyed?
>
I'm sorry I just woke up, I don't quite follow you on this one :-) I
would think that if the only gear cards you have when you encounter
Street Scum are cyberwear, then the trash a gear clause, is not
applicable.


>
> 3) Foxy Roxy and Anti-Social - If both Foxy Roxy and an Anti-Social
> character is on a run, what happens to Personel challenges that
> require a social skill? One rule says they are automatically sleazed
> and the other says that they are automatically Not sleazed! Which is
> it (we have guessed that it IS automatically sleazed based on the
> fact that that is on card text, with Anti Social is a skill! HELP!)
>
>

I would vote for the opposite myself. Thinking about it though you
are probably right. Wasn't there a statement in the RBT that said
card text may "over write" the rules given?

Forrest
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com