Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Nemein <eness@**********.COM>
Subject: Re[2]: Another NERPS Question: (was: Re: NERPS!!!)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 13:12:10 -0700
---Daniel Casquilho <casquild@***********.COM> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> I am not sure I agree with you on this one. If they ment for me
to
> pay the cost of the equipment why not say that on the card? I think
it
> was ment to be a way for a player to dupe and bring out a nice gear
> card cheeper.
> However, you are correct about Tinkerbell and another drone.
> Because NERPS does say No drones or spirits.
> The wording is: "Choose a target Gear card (except Spirits and
> Drones) and treat Nerps as an exact duplicate of that card."
> So the way I see it, I play NERPS and gain an extra of (fill in
> the blank) that I may want/need.
> Has anyone heard what FASA has to say on this?
>
> Daniel
>

Don't know if anyone has asked FASA yet, but I suspect it has been
added to the "list" (how many questions is that up to by the way now?
:-) We're gonna make them regret they even went on vacation).

Anyway, for what it's worth, I would agree with Daniel on this. After
all it is also an unique card. So if you had to pay the cost of the
gear as well as the 3Y for the NERPS I can't imagine why it would be
unique...


==
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Forrest My opinions... Your delete key...
aka Nemein Best when both are used frequently :-)

Check out: www.geocities.com/Area51/Zone/3056/srccg.html
-- TRADES -- SRTCG List card ideas -- LINKS -- & more!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.