Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Another NERPS Question: (was: Re: NERPS!!!)
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:31:11 -0700
---Matb wrote:
>
> > Concerning that phrase "treat Nerps! as an exact duplicate of that
> > card." Let's say we use NERPS! to copy a Fireball. Is NERPS! now a
> > Gear/Magic card or is it still a Special? Can my opponent, two
turns
> > later, play a LotI on NERPS! to try and get rid of the Fireball
spell?
>
> This is the SRTCG version of MtG's Copy Artifact and L5R's Egg of
Pan Ku
> -- and with all the same problems each of those held as well.
>
> My bet's in for both. That offsets the "savings" of the card you
> mentioned earlier (You LotI'd my Dober-drone!)

I'd say this is how I take it as well.

> Having just received one of these through a trade, I have to ask:
>
> Smartgun Link
> Gear (cyberware)
> Play on any ranged weapon.
> (blah blah)
>
> When the weapon is trashed (Street Scum, The Funhouse, Blazing Guns,
> etc.) shouldn't the link be trashed as well? Or does it just become
> inactive ("That's a nice cyber-paperweight you have there, Mr. Bam
Bam.)
> Or can the user re-link it to another toy?

My understanding has been that when a piece of gear is trashed, any
and all attached accesseries go with it. Much like a trashed runner
takes their gear as well.

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Web Page: Poisoned Elves at www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
SRTCG trade lists last updated 9/25/97

_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.