From: | ">>>>> Axlrose - ... <<<<<" <axlrose@**********.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Rulings From Fasa.... |
Date: | Mon, 29 Sep 1997 01:48:10 -0400 |
<snip the reply that started the following...>
>Question, especially with the opposite ruling from what Jim N. gave us
>before and the little blurb at the end about "having to check."
>Was there any signature on whom you got the repsonse from? Was it Jim
>Nelson or Skuzzy (who answer about 80% of the SRTCG mail) or was it
>one of the assitants?
Not to sound harsh, but if an assistant answers the replies, does that mean
he/she will have to be double checked each and every time? Or is this more
for clarification of two differing points of view?
>Just curious as I work to real hammer down when we get two different
>rulings from FASA. I'll write to the guys and try and get a definitive
>"2-out-of-3" on the street scum. I personally like them taking
>cyberware, 'cause if you say no the 'ware then you also get questions
>like "how do they steal spells/spirits and so forth.
> -== Loki ==-
Well, if going along with the Shadowrun universe via the role-playing
books, there are new strains of bacteria that seem to have a mana leeching
ability. Maybe Street Scum have Fab-Guns (I think that is what they're
called) that can drain off the spells and spirits. Maybe some renegade
riggers that can override a player's drone. With numbers, can steal gear.
But cyberwear becomes a part of the person, thus the essence loss. If the
Street Scum can steal that off a person, does the person then regain the
lost essence? If not, why not?
Answering a question with a question -
>>>>>Axlrose - ...<<<<<