Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phillip G Jaros <phillip_jaros@**.US.SWISSBANK.COM>
Subject: Deck Types (was Re: Stun Gloves - Another Question to Fasa)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 06:03:04 CDT
Matb wrote:
>> This is how I thought they were intended, but it tends to get out of
>> hand fast. My melee monster gang type deck really gets out of hand,
>> the only real problem it has is when it goes up against the
>> R-cubed deck that uses Renraku, Robo-Plant Revolt, and all electrical
>> challanges.
>
>Hey! That's my deck!

hehehehe...
I think I've either made (I've made and used around 20 differant decks)
or played against every possible deck to this point. ;)

The most powerful of which have been:

The Rigger/Renraku/Robo-Plant Revolt Deck (fairly easy to put together)
The Shaman/Biotech Deck (needs alot of rares - 4 Moonshadow)
The Melee Monster Deck (Fairly easy to put together)
The Challenge/Special Deck (which is rather boring to play, but pretty
easy to put together)
The Flatline and Friends Deck (needs 4 promo's so not a great option)

So in a tournament I'ld expect to run into R3 or a big bruiser deck.
With a chance at maybe a Mage deck (I have yet to find away to make
a very strong Mage deck).

What types of decks do other people play?

I like to play Racial decks for fun, and I think a human deck could be
a great tourny deck with the use of Humanis Policlub ganger and Sudden
Goblinazations. Afterall, they don't become metahumans until after
they are brought out. Unfotunately I don't have any SGs.

But besides that I'm running out of ideas... :(


--
Phil Jaros 888888888 Chicago Tech Support
jarosph@**.us.swissbank.com O=O=O=O=O SBC Warburg Dillon Read
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.