Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Misc. Comments and Questions
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 18:39:47 -0700
---Phillip G Jaros wrote:
>
> >Also, only one type of weapon may be used per Runner in a given
> >combat. So whoever it was that was asking about a Ambidextrous Lord
> >Torgo with Katana's and Stun Gloves was making a moot point.
>
> I can't imagine that you need to use the same type of weapon.
> The line about "only one type of weapon may be used per Runner in
> a given combat" is said to prevent someone from saying they are using
> a Panther Assult Cannon, 2 Berettas, a Are Preditor and a Katana
> in this combat. Ambidextrous allows a user to use 2 pistols
> (ie 2 Berettas, A berreta and a Ceska, 2 Preditors etc...) or 2
> HTH weapons (ie 2 Katanas, a Katana and a Hand Razors etc...)
> or (if you read the card loosely) a pistol and a HTH weapon.
> If it HAS to be the exact same weapon it is a pretty bad card.
>
> You can only have 4 of one weapon in a deck and most decks have
> 60 or so cards in them so the odds of getting two of the same
> weapons and Ambidextrous (assumming you don't have multiples
> since it is a Rare) is not that good.
>
> This of course is IMHO....
>
> Could you PLEASE ask Fasa about using two types of Pistols with
> Ambedextrous as well?

Ambidextrous does bend the standard weapons rules. I was answering the
previous post between calls at work, and so hadn't thought out the big
picture. I should have stuck with type referring to class of weapon,
not specific kinds (IOW - Pistol, HTH, etc.) Considering I've used
both a Beretta and Ares Predator on Flatline at the same time, I'd
have to agree with you on different kinds of a Pistol working with
Ambidexterity.

Ambidextrous
Type: Special
Rarity: Rare
Description: 2¥. Target Runner may use two pistols or Hand-to-Hand
Weapons simultaneously. Leave this card on target Runner when played.

Considering the wording of the card, I don't know if I agree with a
Katana/Beretta combo. Seems to me that you may either use Pistols *OR*
HTH weapons. Not a combo of the two.

> >One other thing, since stun gloves are a weapon. If you use them, I
> >would expect that you don't also deal damage. You either trash the
> >target or you don't. I would expect this is taking place during a
> >weapon's normal damage dealing phase, so your target gets to deal
> >their damage before being trashed. (Kinda like the example of Chomps
> >2000 getting dropped to a 6/0 by Milk Run. He's trashed because of
his
> >Body being a zero but he'll deal his damage first.)
> >
> >Does any of that make sense?
>
> I understand what you are saying, but I still can't imagine it
> being used to often if the Challenge is allowed to deal it's
> damage. Anyone who has a decent chance of using the Stun Gloves
> (ie Melee of 2 or more) would be better off slugging it out with
> a couple of other runners, rather then give up it's attack value.

Not always true. A succesful attack with the Stun Gloves trashes the
Challenge no matter what. It could be a weenie or a pumpable monster
that nu yen took beyond reality. Sometimes your Big Bully's may have
other circumstances decreasing Attack Value and slugging it out may
not be the best option - Rough Night, damaged w/o Stamina, Armor, etc.

Sometimes it works to put Stun Gloves on the weenie in the group. His
damge may not make a difference normally anyways, but that lucky roll
with the Gloves may do the job if the Big Bullies don't. :o)

I'll be asking FASA, but I still feel since they're a Weapon, the
above (during normal combat) is how the Gloves are supposed to work.

-== Loki ==-
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.