From:	Quicksilver <qwksilvr@*****.COM>
Subject:	Re: Kinda Early Tourney Stuff (was Re: Vengance is Mine!)
Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 1997 20:51:14 -0500

At 03:11 PM 10/7/97 -0400, you wrote:

>Having all multiplayer or all 1 on 1 games leads to specific decks
>and styles of play. I'd like to see the winner being more well-
>rounded...
>
>How about:
>48 seats -> 12 4-player games
>12 seats -> 4 3-player games
> 4 seats -> 2 2-player games
> 2 seats -> 1 2-player games
>
>and the person with the highest rep total after the time limit
>(50 mins?) advances? A bit more politicking at the bottom end,
>and a bit more beating things up at the top...

Sounds good. But I'd recommend you keep in mind that you may not
always fill that many seats. A format that can grow and shrink would be
good. Maybe something based on a repeatable base of 12 players? That way it
could be used at smaller events as well so that players could get used to a
consistant format.

Hg