Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phillip G Jaros <phillip_jaros@**.US.SWISSBANK.COM>
Subject: Critique my new deck please:
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 04:42:32 CDT
Well, I just made a new deck again, but this time I'm not sure on
how well it will work. I'm trying to go with the 70/6 formula
that seems to be so popular (I usually play 60/6). The group of
people I usually play with are kind of burned out, so they want to
stop playing it for a while. And the only other person I play with
is Rob Harris, who I only play when I'm in Champaign Urbana for
Earthdawn...

Let me know what you think, and what cards you would put in/take
out to make it more effective.

Anyone in the Chicagoland area, who wants to play a couple of games
of Shadowrun, email me and we can try and set up a time/place.

Here is what is in my deck so far:

Runners: (14)
2 Cannonball
1 Cherry Bomb
1 Drake
1 Ghost Who Walks
1 Gore Tusk
1 Iron Mike
2 Scorpio
1 Shellshock
4 Thrash

Gear: (16)
4 Laser Scope
2 Armor Piecing Ammo
2 Smartgun Link
2 Ranger Arms SM-3
4 Ranger-X
2 Silencers

Contacts: (2)
2 Squatter

Specials: (13)
1 All or Nothing
1 Blindsided
1 Even Steven
1 False Mentor
2 Green Apple Quick Steps
1 Lowfwyr's Schemes
1 Luck of The Irish
3 Moon Lighting
1 Reinforcements
1 Rush Job

Challenges: (25)
1 Booby Trap
2 Chomps-2000 Guard Dog
1 Elite Security Mage
1 Guardian Dracoform
1 Gut Check
4 Highway Showdown
1 Heavy Sentry Gun
4 Hellhound
1 Hellish Traffic
2 Hunting Gargoyle
1 Killer Drone
1 Mafia Goons
1 Mine Field
1 Nets
1 Runner On Retainer
1 Security Consultant
1 The Big Chase

Objectives: (6)
3 Assassination
2 Cotton Mouth
1 Sucker Run


--
Phil Jaros 888888888 Chicago Tech Support
jarosph@**.us.swissbank.com O=O=O=O=O SBC Warburg Dillon Read
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.