Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Michael/Tamara Pease-Lorenz <treehugr@****.ON.ROGERS.WAVE.CA>
Subject: Fasa's Latest Rulings #1
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:05:50 -0500
Received: from mrin44.mail.aol.com ([198.81.19.154]) by mail.on.rogers.wave.ca with ESMTP
id <325527-8782>; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:41:48 -0500
Received: (from root@*********)
by mrin44.mail.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
id WAA27248 for treehugr@****.on.rogers.wave.ca;
Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:41:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:41:39 -0500 (EST)
From: FASACorp2@***.com
Message-ID: <971026224138_1567721532@******.mail.aol.com>
To: treehugr@****.on.rogers.wave.ca
Subject: Re: A few questions! :)

In a message dated 10/26/97 11:01:07 AM, you wrote:

<<I have a few questions regarding how many runners can be used or even
triggered to go on a run.

1) If I have 6 runners active on a run:
a) Can I use Snipers roost to assist the team from the safehouse?
b) Can I use multiple Runners with FN Har <indirect fire>?

No and no. No more than 6 Runners can participate in a shadowrun.

2) If I declare 6 runners to form a Shadowruning team and:
a) 1 runner turns back from a Bad Lunch/Private Security Mage/Green
Apple Quick Steps/dies/etc, can I then 'turn' Red Widow/Runner with a
Yamaha Rapier to send her on the run?

No (see above).

b) 1 runner gets turns back for the same above reasons, can someone
else then send in a similar runner?

No (see above).

3) FastJack the Decker questions:
a) Can he use his ability on a 'closed system'?
Yes.

b) Can he turn to assist another runner team other than his his
own?<ie: an ally team mate>
Yes.
c) Must he be present on the run and therefore count towards the 6
runner total to use his ability?
No.

4) When do you LotI someone else's LotI? Is it declared before the first
LotI is rolled or played after the first LotI is rolled?>>
Before the first one takes effect. Otherwise, what's the point?

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.