Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Nemein <nemein@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: bugged deck
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 08:51:09 -0800
---Noah Overton <NOAH_OVERTON@*************.OM.HP.COM> wrote:
>
> heres some thing that came up last night. in a multi player game
> if you bug some ones deck that had bugged some ones deck do you also
> get to look at the challenges that the second bugged deck gets to
look
> at.
>
> bugged deck reads :play on target Decker. any Challenges that
> target Decker sees using Recon or Gear/Programs, you also see.
>
> example player 1 bugs player 2 who in turn bugs player three.
> player 3 use browse to look at two challenges player 2 they vie
bugged
> deck looks at them thus would allow player one to look at them. does
> this sound right to every one.
>
> noah
>


I would vote no on this. Let's see if I can get the wording right now
as to why... As P1 you are playing your Bugged Deck on P2's decker,
important distinction here. When P2 activates his Bugged Deck on P3's
decker it is P2 not P2's decker who is seeing the challenge. If there
was a "backward" link between your decker and his decker then it would
work. However, since there is no reference to your decker (and you
don't even need a decker to play Bugged Deck) P2's decker is not
viewing the challenge so P1's bugged deck wouldn't "activate".

Does that make sense?
==
Forrest My opinions... Your delete key...
aka Nemein Best when both are used freely :-)

Shadowrun: www.geocities.com/Area51/Zone/3056/srccg.html
Last updates - SRCard List ideas: 13 Oct '97
My ideas: 23 Oct '97 (Now over 50!)
Doomtrooper: www.geocities.com/Area51/Zone/3056/dtccg.html
__________________________________________________________________
Sent by Yahoo! Mail. Get your free e-mail at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.