Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Runners and Decks (was Re: )
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 05:31:09 -0800
---G-Man-99 <G-Man-99@******.COM> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>>> I had a question about runners in general. Can you have 2 or more
of the same runners in your safehouse and if so can they be sent on
the same run togeather (I.E. I have 2 stompers on the same run) or are
the duplicates in the deck used as replacements for the runners you
like best.<<<

You can have up to four each of the basic Runners in your deck, and
all four can be in play at a given time. (Ask my group about my Red
Widows. ;o) Though there can be four in your deck, Prime Runners may
only have one of themselves in play at a time. There may be only one
of a Unique Runner, like H-man 2057, in your deck.


>>> I also have a question about Deckers. Do deckers need a deck to
use matrix cards, such as Browse, Black Hammer or any number of these
cards. It would seem to me that one would need the deck (as in the
RPG) to use ones programs, or are they considered to have the bottom
of the line deck os they are not useless until they gain a deck.<<<

They can work w/o a deck. Consider it that they have the Radio Shack
or a cranial deck active 'til they get a better one. Or maybe they're
just going tortise. <shrug>

**One other thing, check your mailer. You're personal addy is
overriding the List address in your Reply-To field. Thanks!

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 10/20/97


__________________________________________________________________
Sent by Yahoo! Mail. Get your free e-mail at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.