Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Rob Harris <rjharris@********.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: All Decker Team
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 23:18:20 -0600
'Friad it's not valid guys. The biggest problem you will have is - what
happens when you encounter a challenge. You can't sleaze it, because
runners (even deckers) not present have no skills. You can't fight it ,
cause only present runners can fight it. So it has a threat rating, you
will just go home. A fun way to burn off the non-scary challenges, but
almost impossible to make it all the way to the objective. Nice thinking
though!

Rob

----------
> From: Mamoulian <shine@************.NET>
> To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Subject: Re: All Decker Team
> Date: Sunday, November 30, 1997 1:29 PM
>
> At 11:14 AM 11/30/97 -0800, you wrote:
> > Deckers go on runs from the safehouse, so they aren't present on
> >the shadowrun. This means they aren't damaged by challenges like hit
and
> >run. Can the run continue if the entire physical team is killed? A
> >runner has to be present to win an objective, so you could just use a
> >Rapier to get someone present once the team of all deckers weaseled past
> >the challenges. Is this a valid tactic?
> >
> >-Crow
>
> Yea...I believe it is a valid tactic. With the exception of how do you
> trash runners that aren't there? What's the compensation? What about
> objectives that don't have challenges? (Urban Brawl, Cleanse The Hive)
that
> don't have challenges? Simple cards like Corpselight could stop every
run
> you go on( There are no deckers with leadership) Not to mention the
nasty
> cards like Barfight, Riots, Wanted, runners on retainer, drive by. Any
of
> these cards would knock a decker down to about nothing(with the exception
> of Tiny....who would still get his butt kicked by about any Sam) Don't
get
> me wrong. I love the power of the decker in SRTCG, but be realistic.
>
> Mamo
> >

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.