Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: FASA alive or dead?
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 17:46:06 -0800
---Michael/Tamara Pease-Lorenz <treehugr@****.ON.ROGERS.WAVE.CA> wrote:
>
> Quicksilver wrote:
> > You lost me (not all that hard to do sometimes).
> > AFAIK, multiple players cannot score rep at the same time.
>
> Yikes a reply! I dinna think anyone was on this anymore.
OKay while I
> have someone's attention :-) here is what i mean.
>
> Player A,B,C all have media chicks out and in play. Player D is
about to
> make a game winning run and players A,B,C all bet with their Media
> chicks enuff that they will also achieve the required Rep points to
win.
>
> My question is simply Who is the winner? Since everyone
achieved the
> required Rep points off one run.

I didn't think to comment on this in my previous reply. However, Media
Chick wouldn't work that way for the players who's turn it isn't. By
the wording of Media Chick, they would just be increasing the rep of
the player who's currently taking their turn (a stupid move on their
part).

The double edge is by the wording of the card, should the play
currently taking their turn decide to pull out. The other players that
had used Media Chick out of turn would be sunk abd lose rep.

Read the card, using it any other time outside of your own turn for
your own run is a no-win situation.

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 10/20/97

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.