Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Guard (was Re: SRCARD Digest...)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 17:20:00 -0800
---Jeffrey Nuremburg <xanatos@********.NET> wrote:
>
> Hey All.
>
> Okay, another issue came up the last game I played, so I'll place it
out
> here to see what people think.

First, your subject line is coming up as a generic response to the
digest. If you could, try to change it to something more spefically
geared to what your post is about. Thanx! :o)

> When a card like Wanted or Bar Fight is played, each player
ends up
> with a runner involved in the ensuing combat (assuming no additional
cards
> cancel the bar fight or wanted). Anyway, is either player allowed
to turn a
> runner with Guard to redirect damage from his runner in the combat?
Also,
> how much damage can be moved to a runner with guard? (Do you have
to move
> it all, any you wish, or all up to the guards body)?

I guard works in combat against a Challenge, I don't see why it
wouldn't work for damage in runner-vs-runner combat. As for how much
damage to soak: page 29 of the RBT says "A Runner with Guard may take
damage equal to his body." I assume this to mean two things. One, that
he may take damage equal to his body + armor (i.e. enough to kill him,
but not more, as has been clarified by FASA in other areas of alotting
damage). Two, the word MAY means he can choose to take anywhere from
one point to the lethal number.

-== Loki ==-
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 10/20/97

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.