Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: Hello...and a few questions
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 19:45:01 -0800
> >> > 1.2.1)Is it possible to be turned AND in the Safehouse?
> >> > 2)Let me make sure I heard this right...Can you have all/some of your
> >> > deckers visit Fuchi and still have your Street Samaurai's go on a
> >> > Shadowrun?

> >Given the precedent set by the Z-zone, not to mention the difference in
> >timing (viz, you visit Locations in your Legwork and go on a shadowrun on the
> >Shadowrun phase), as well as game-balance issues, it is my lasting opinion that
you cannot
> >both visit the Location and go on a shadowrun.

> I did not imply that a runner should be able to visit a location AND go on
> a Shadowrun, I am asking if you have to give up your 1 shadowrun in your
> shadowrun phase if you have a decker(s) go after Fuchi?

Allow me to explain: Normally a Runner cannot both visit a Location and
take part in a
shadowrun. (Runners have to turn to visit, and only unturned Runners
can participate in a
shadowrun.) This is handled by the core rules; to repeat this on a card
is unecessarily redundant, and leads to the belief that some other
effect was intended. Namely, that in using
Fuchi, you bypass your shadowrun phase -- again, this matches with the
Z-zone, and balances
out the Fuchi card. Otherwise, you just send teams of two or three
deckers in waves, and build
up a lot of nuyen very quickly (or, with the right deckers and decks,
score as much Rep as
another player might get on a shadowrun with Challenges on it).

So the answer is, no, you may not use Fuchi and go on "another"
shadowrun with non-Deckers.

I've forgotten who posed the original conecpt; it seems ridiculously
rules-lawyerish the more I think about it.



-Mb

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.