Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Crane <jack9@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: Hello...and a few questions
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 20:56:14 -0800
At 07:45 PM 12/8/97 -0800, you wrote:
>> >> > 1.2.1)Is it possible to be turned AND in the Safehouse?
>> >> > 2)Let me make sure I heard this right...Can you have all/some of
your
>> >> > deckers visit Fuchi and still have your Street Samaurai's go on a
>> >> > Shadowrun?
>
>> >Given the precedent set by the Z-zone, not to mention the difference in
>> >timing (viz, you visit Locations in your Legwork and go on a shadowrun
on the
>> >Shadowrun phase), as well as game-balance issues, it is my lasting
opinion that you cannot
>> >both visit the Location and go on a shadowrun.
>
>> I did not imply that a runner should be able to visit a location AND go on
>> a Shadowrun, I am asking if you have to give up your 1 shadowrun in your
>> shadowrun phase if you have a decker(s) go after Fuchi?
>
>Allow me to explain: Normally a Runner cannot both visit a Location and
>take part in a
>shadowrun. (Runners have to turn to visit, and only unturned Runners
>can participate in a
>shadowrun.) This is handled by the core rules; to repeat this on a card
>is unecessarily redundant, and leads to the belief that some other
>effect was intended. Namely, that in using
>Fuchi, you bypass your shadowrun phase -- again, this matches with the
>Z-zone, and balances
>out the Fuchi card. Otherwise, you just send teams of two or three
>deckers in waves, and build
>up a lot of nuyen very quickly (or, with the right deckers and decks,
>score as much Rep as
>another player might get on a shadowrun with Challenges on it).
>

Let me go on...ad-nauseam to ask one more quetion....
Does it make sense/is it legal that you can visit it with more than 1 group
of deckers?

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.