| From: | Rob Harris <rjharris@********.UIUC.EDU> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Turned runners in the safehouse |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Dec 1997 02:09:46 -0600 |
present. You can use this definition anytime a card is required to be
present with another card (like gaurd). The story/reason that turned cards
are not present in the safehouse is to indicate that they are out "doing"
something. So when a character is turned to visit a location, he is at that
location, and not "present" in the safehouse when your character is
attacked with wanted. This ruling has been checked and verified with (a
very non-responsive currently) FASA.
Rob Harris
----------
> From: Jeffrey Nuremburg <xanatos@********.NET>
> To: SRCARD@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Subject: Turned runners in the safehouse
> Date: Tuesday, December 09, 1997 12:33 AM
>
> > > 1.2.1)Is it possible to be turned AND in the Safehouse?
> > >
> > From what we have discussed on this list, no. A turned runner is not
> > "present" with unturned runners in the Safehouse.
>
> This does not make any sense and is stated nowhere in the rules.
> Being turned does not have any bearing on whether or not a runner is in
the
> safehouse. A runner is not in the safehouse if he is on a shadowrun or
is
> currently engaged in the use of a card that takes him out of the
safehouse
> (i.e - Z-zone, wanted, bar fight, etc.)
>
> As an example, lets say that I turn Tempest to inflict 1
> armor-piercing damage on all runners in play during my Legwork phase. On
my
> opponent's turn he riots. I assign the 2 damage to all of my runners as
> appropriate. He then riots again. Even though Tempest is tapped she is
> unquesionably currently in my safehouse. I turn Knuckles (who is
untapped
> in my safehouse) at this point to take the 2 damage meant for Tempest and
> she remains alive.
>
>
> --
> Jeffrey Nuremburg / Assistant System Administrator
> xanatos@********.net
> cgiguy@********.net - All CGI related requests
>
> "I've been an atheist - I had found it difficult to
> have religios beliefs and scientific ones, but I've
> accepted that I have a duality - there's a human
> way of interacting with people but also a mechanistic
> explanation of what people are and how they work."
>
> - Rodney Brooks, Director of MIT's AI Lab
