Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Crane <jack9@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: Turned runners in the safehouse
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:20:56 -0800
>>> > 1.2.1)Is it possible to be turned AND in the Safehouse?
>>> >
>>> From what we have discussed on this list, no. A turned runner is not
>>> "present" with unturned runners in the Safehouse.
>>
>> This does not make any sense and is stated nowhere in the
>rules.
>>Being turned does not have any bearing on whether or not a runner is in
>the
>>safehouse. A runner is not in the safehouse if he is on a shadowrun or
>is
>>currently engaged in the use of a card that takes him out of the
>safehouse
>>(i.e - Z-zone, wanted, bar fight, etc.)
>>
>> As an example, lets say that I turn Tempest to inflict 1
>>armor-piercing damage on all runners in play during my Legwork phase.
>On my
>>opponent's turn he riots. I assign the 2 damage to all of my runners
>as
>>appropriate. He then riots again. Even though Tempest is tapped she
>is
>>unquesionably currently in my safehouse. I turn Knuckles (who is
>untapped
>>in my safehouse) at this point to take the 2 damage meant for Tempest
>and
>>she remains alive.
>>
>>
>Wrong! If a runner is tappped it is not considered present in the
>safehouse and you cannot use guard.

I guess we have a difference in opinion.
Just because the rule book says it doesn't mean it is the way that you
should play it. The game is not perfect, but with a little work it could be!
It would seem to me that, to a Shadowrun vet like you that, would make
sense.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.