Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Nemein <nemein@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Skillsofts and Chipjacks
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 14:21:17 -0800
---DJ Schwa2 <DJSchwa2@***.COM> wrote:
>
> My $0.02 on skillsofts and chipjacks:
>
> I can see the way FASA set up chipjacks 1, 2, and 3 in the SRTCG. I
think for
> a card game it works but I see no reason why a runner couldn't have
more than
> one skillsoft in his/her possession and switch them in the chipjack
at some
> point. This might require turning the runner to indicate this action
or have
> the runner decide at the beginning of the legwork phase which
skillsofts are
> being used for the duration of that turn. I have never played any
decks with
> chipjacks and skillsofts although I would like to. In a roleplaying
game they
> make sense but in a card game, it seems they are taking up a card
slot that
> could be replaced by a runner that has the skill(s) you would use.
> Anyone else care to comment? Would like to hear about this.
>


I think the best approach would be a "choose before you run" sort of
thing. That way a runner can have as many chips as they want, you
just have to select which ones you "jack in" before you go on the run.
This also justifies the cost/benefit of chipjack-3 over chipjack-1 in
that it gives you more opportunities to gamble you are choosing the
right chips.


==
Forrest My opinions... Your delete key...
aka Nemein Best when both are used freely :-)

Shadowrun: www.geocities.com/Area51/Zone/3056/srccg.html
-- Decks - Card ideas - "Rising Sun" expansion --
Doomtrooper: www.geocities.com/Area51/Zone/3056/dtccg.html
Dark Eden: www.geocities.com/Area51/Zone/3056/deccg.html
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.