Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "J.P Haworth" <jhaworth@*******.COM>
Subject: Fuchi
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 02:06:07 -0800
I just received an e-mail back from Fasa on the correct ruling for Fuchi
Industries, below is my questions and Fasa's response. It seems I have
been playing Fuchi wrong all the time, I had just assumed that you could
send a group of Deckers to Fuchi and send other runners on a shadowrun.
Well I guess I'm only human, or am I?
I changed the original ruling which for the second question the
original reply was yes but just as I was about to send this I received
another e-mail.

In a message dated 12/8/97 7:48:46 PM, you wrote:

<<1. Can say 4 Statics go to Fuchi and then Hatchetman, Scorpio and
Skidz
go on a shadowrun on the same turn. The card says that "one or more
deckers may visit Fuchi instead of going on a shadowrun"

The phrasing on the card is bad (big surprise. I wish we had been able
to
spend more time considering the wording on the cards. we blew it more
often
than I care to admit <sigh>). A visit to Fuchi takes the place of a
shadowrun.
The card makes it sound as though Deckers are the only ones who can miss
the
shadowrun, but the intent is that a visit to Fuchi is done instead of a
shadowrun.

2. Can you send more than one group of deckers to Fuchi in the same
turn, example send 4 Statics, them 4 Ice Queens in another group, 4 The
Moles in a final group. I think this should be possible because more
than 1 runner can visit other locations like The Iron Lung, Hermetic
Library etc>>
Oops! I mean NO! Because Fuchi takes the place of a shadowrun,
you can only go
once per turn. Sorry about that yes (it's late).

Thanx
Redman

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.